Wacky Dem Nominee Writes Song Hoping Senator Dies

Democratic Party donkey symbol on American flag — Photo: danielfela / Shutterstock

Michigan’s swing-seat Democrat deleted posts mocking moderates and wishing a senator would “hurry up and die,” then said the record no longer reflects his views.

Story Snapshot

William Lawrence scrubbed hundreds of posts before his House run.
Recovered posts backed defunding police and “free and open” migration.
Lawrence says he regrets some posts and rejects those positions today.
Archival tools let critics cite his deletions while he offers context.

What Was Deleted And Why It Matters In A Swing District

CNN reported that William Lawrence removed hundreds of posts that had praised police and prison abolition, targeted moderate Democrats, and even advocated a “fundamental overhaul” of the Constitution. One recovered post said “f**k” the nuclear-family home and another pushed to “Abolish the Senate”. Semafor reported he backed defunding police in 2020 and repeated it in 2021, and he once urged a world of “free and open migration”. Lawrence said he deleted posts to avoid misinterpretation.

🚨William Lawrence is NOT fit to serve in Congress.@WeWill2026 deleted hundreds of posts because he knows voters would NEVER accept his radical agenda:

❌ No police. No prisons.
❌ Open borders.
❌ Abolish the Senate.
❌ Forced nationalization of fossil fuels.
❌ Attacks on… https://t.co/BlzQCb3HsI

— Lisa McClain (@LisaForCongress) September 4, 2026

Critics argue the volume and contents show a hard-left record, not random misfires. A Detroit News account said some deletions were recovered from the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, which lets opponents quote past statements even after they vanish from a feed. That asymmetry is powerful in a battleground seat: one side shows screenshots; the other tries to explain context. In politics, the first hit often sticks, and opponents know it.

Lawrence’s Response And The Walk-Back Line

Lawrence told reporters he disagrees today with some past posts, and that he does not support defunding the police or open borders. He framed his earlier tone as anger at political elites and war policy, and he has called some of his words clumsy and out of context. Semafor reported he scrubbed posts before launching his campaign because they could be misread. Punchbowl News said he has since walked back prior stances tied to defunding. That is the defense: evolution, not concealment.

Here is the rub for voters who prize order, family, and limited government. When a candidate once wrote off the nuclear-family home and urged police abolition, that is not a typo; it is a worldview signal. If he now disavows those views, he needs plain, testable policy pledges that match words with deed. Saying “I changed” is easy. Showing it with a safety-first agenda and respect for institutions is the proof test.

The Digital Boomerang: How Old Posts Shape New Campaigns

Modern campaigns run on opposition research, web archives, and instant outrage. Studies show that deletions are common and often mundane, but the ones that resurface tend to fit the cleanest attack line. The Wayback Machine gives reporters and rivals a durable trail, even when platforms drop tracking tools like Politwoops. That reality creates one-sided evidence: the recovered words exist in stone; the new words ask for trust. In a close race, trust is scarce and screens are forever.

🚨BREAKING: William Lawrence, a Democrat running for Congress in Michigan, has deleted hundreds of social media posts advocating police and prison abolition, nationalizing fossil-fuel companies, and dismantling the Senate, according to CNN.

The deleted posts also included… pic.twitter.com/CV3vxPcjod

— Off The Press (@OffThePress1) September 4, 2026

Common sense says people can grow up and cool down. Common sense also says you judge a would-be lawmaker on core issues: public safety, borders, fidelity to the Constitution, and respect for family life. Lawrence says his views matured. The documented record shows he once praised ideas that would weaken police, blur borders, and sideline key institutions. Voters in the middle will likely demand a straight answer, backed by concrete policies, not another deletion.